If you didn’t take Secured Transactions in law school because everyone reassured you you’d learn everything you needed to know about it during BarBri, and then in BarBri the teacher positively careens through Secured Transactions, barely even stopping for breath, let alone explanations, because “you all remember this from your secured transactions class in law school anyway,” how big a problem is that going to prove to be, exactly?
Considering how little I remember from secured transactions in law school? I’m crossing my fingers that they won’t actually test on it, because it hasn’t been tested here for like 15 years, but it’s still listed as a possible subject. Yeah, it could get ugly.
…so what you’re saying is, the teacher didn’t take Secured Transactions, either, and has managed to not teach it. Right?
In that case, I’d say you’re in pretty good shape.