Comments on: serious question http://www.pseudostoops.com/2007/06/serious-question/ Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:57:10 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4 By: plainsfeminist http://www.pseudostoops.com/2007/06/serious-question/comment-page-1/#comment-297 plainsfeminist Fri, 22 Jun 2007 05:12:35 +0000 http://pseudostoops.wordpress.com/2007/06/21/serious-question/#comment-297 ...so what you're saying is, the teacher didn't take Secured Transactions, either, and has managed to not teach it. Right? In that case, I'd say you're in pretty good shape. …so what you’re saying is, the teacher didn’t take Secured Transactions, either, and has managed to not teach it. Right?

In that case, I’d say you’re in pretty good shape.

]]> By: stare decisis http://www.pseudostoops.com/2007/06/serious-question/comment-page-1/#comment-296 stare decisis Thu, 21 Jun 2007 05:08:41 +0000 http://pseudostoops.wordpress.com/2007/06/21/serious-question/#comment-296 Considering how little I remember from secured transactions in law school? I'm crossing my fingers that they won't actually test on it, because it hasn't been tested here for like 15 years, but it's still listed as a possible subject. Yeah, it could get ugly. Considering how little I remember from secured transactions in law school? I’m crossing my fingers that they won’t actually test on it, because it hasn’t been tested here for like 15 years, but it’s still listed as a possible subject. Yeah, it could get ugly.

]]>