Who wants to hear a totally pointless rant about a comparatively minor topic in which I make myself sound like crotchety old person? No one? TOUGH COOKIES.
Here is what I would like: I would like to buy a reasonably cute, not terribly expensive summer dress or two with a hemline long enough that I do not risk exposing the entire population of the city of Chicago to Ladytown in the event of a strong gust of wind.
Apparently, that is fucking impossible.
Seriously, clothing designers, does everyone demand micro-minis these days? Is no one interested in a dress that stretches even half way to the knees?
Let’s take a gander at some of the styles I’ve recently seen, liked, and ultimately had to reject because I’d like to be able to sit down in my dresses without fear of underpants exposure:
Adorbs, right? Except when you click on measurement, you learn that the length of the ENTIRE DRESS is 32.5 inches. Because I am a giver, and wanted to demonstrate the true magnitude of this problem, I shall now post for you a picture of me in a dress that I ordered off the internet that was described as being 34 inches long. A dress I eventually gave away to Sam because I decided it was sort of obscene and I was never going to feel comfortable wearing it out of the house:
That’s a lot of leg, my friend! Too much, in fact! (Forgive the lousy lighting – I actually tried to set up a demonstration of this problem last night by folding up my pj pants to the correct length last night, but now cannot find the camera cord. That’s probably for the best.) Anyway, the adorable navy and white sundress above? Is even shorter than the black dress I’m wearing in the photo. Perhaps in a climate with no wind, where one was never expected to sit down, one could wear this? Here in real life, though? TOO SHORT.
Or how about this one? Stylistically, I’ll admit, it’s not for everyone, but it’s yellow! And adorable! And cheap! And the name of the style is “You’ve Got Quail!” How can one resist a dress whose name is a movie pun?
Oh. One can resist when one realizes that the adorable quail dress is EVEN SHORTER than the one listed above. Good god.
How about this adorable floral dress? So pretty and fun in the picture! Perfect for summer parties! And all for less than $40!
Except then when I tried it on in the store IT DID NOT EVEN COVER MY WHOLE BUTT I AM NOT EVEN LYING.
This problem is not limited to sundresses, either. This number is billed as being work-appropriate:
I’m sorry, but is it okay in your workplace to wear a dress that’s six inches above the knee? Because in my workplace, that’s frowned upon. (See how the model, doubtless a tall girl herself, is bending her leg all funny? She’s trying to hide how short the dress is! I see this all the time now! Ladies, look for this scam the next time you are window shopping online- if the model is slouched over and her legs look bent at an odd angle, ask yourself: is this all an elaborate plot to pretend that this dress is long enough to wear in public? Don’t be fooled!)
Or how about a party dress? This one would be perfect for a summer wedding- different and fun, and only $62!
Except- you guessed it! 32 inches long! Congratulations, bride and groom! My pasty white upper thighs say congratulations, too!
Don’t even get me started on shoes, and how everyone seems to think now that anything under a four inch heel is a one-way ticket to DowdyTown. I pretty much went around the bend the other day when I saw these featured, with admiration, on outblush:

REALLY? SERIOUSLY? I mean, come ON.









